Terms of Reality.

 Certain terms used for reality
are of comfort to people.
This need not be separate us,
as reality is beyond terminology.

 This where we have to know the difference between expedient and literal language…and at some time, these became muddled up. A very subtle idea may have been placed in peoples’ mind’s which changes their whole view of themselves, and thereby they lost their power. It makes one wonder if this was intentional!

The terms we use to describe reality should not divide us, but they do. We may call it absolute truth, Essence, Emptiness, Dharamakaya, Self, God, Source, Heart, Transcendent Knowledge, Wisdom, I am… etc, but what is important is the meaning behind the words. We find what suits our understanding, but this need not separate us from others. Unfortunately it does, and so true spirituality is mixed up with terminology, which creates ‘religion’, and so people hate and separate.

 Somewhere along our time-line our pure nature became separated from us, and we gave our power away to either an imagined self or an external being. When we become dogmatic, we create ‘religion/separation’.

 This is a brief account from Ramana Mahashi – he uses the different names for reality. Ramana Mahashi was regarded as enlightened: whether he was or not will depend on your own awareness …the Buddha in the mud!

 The nature of the Self

The essence of Sri Ramana’s teachings is conveyed in his frequent assertions that there is a single immanent reality, directly experienced by everyone, which is simultaneously the source, the substance and the real nature of everything that exists. He gave it a number of different names, each one signifying a different aspect of the same indivisible reality. The following classification includes all of his more common synonyms and explains the implications of the various terms used.

 The Self This is the term that he used the most frequently. He defined it by saying that the real Self or real `I’ is, contrary to perceptible experience, not an experience of individuality but a non-personal, all-inclusive awareness. It is not to be confused with the individual self which he said was essentially non-existent, being a fabrication of the mind which obscures the true experience of the real Self. He maintained that the real Self is always present and always experienced but he emphasized that one is only consciously aware of it as it really is when the self-limiting tendencies of the mind have ceased. Permanent and continuous Self-awareness is known as Self-realization.

Sat-chit-ananda This is a Sanskrit term which translates as being-consciousness-bliss. Sri Ramana taught that the Self is pure being, a subjective awareness of `I am’ which is completely devoid of the feeling `I am this’ or `I am that’. There are no subjects or objects in the Self, there is only an awareness of being. Because this awareness is conscious it is also known as consciousness. The direct experience of this consciousness is, according to Sri Ramana, a state of unbroken happiness and so the term ananda or bliss is also used to describe it. These three aspects, being, consciousness and bliss, are experienced as a unitary whole and not as separate attributes of the Self. They are inseparable in the same way that wetness, transparency and liquidity are inseparable properties of water.

 God Sri Ramana maintained that the universe is sustained by the power of the Self. Since theists normally attribute this power to God he often used the word God as a synonym for the Self. He also used the words Brahman, the supreme being of Hinduism, and Siva, a Hindu name for God, in the same way. Sri Ramana’s God is not a personal God, he is the formless being which sustains the universe. He is not the creator of the universe, the universe is merely a manifestation of his inherent power; he is inseparable from it, but he is not affected by its appearance or its disappearance.

The Heart Sri Ramana frequently used the Sanskrit word hridayam when he was talking about the Self. It is usually translated as `the Heart’ but a more literal translation would be `this is the centre’. In using this particular term he was not implying that there was a particular location or centre for the Self, he was merely indicating that the Self was the source from which all appearances manifested.

Jnana The experience of the Self is sometimes called jnana or knowledge. This term should not be taken to mean that there is a person who has knowledge of the Self, because in the state of Self-awareness there is no localized knower and there is nothing that is separate from the Self that can be known. True knowledge, or jnana, is not an object of experience, nor is it an understanding of a state which is different and apart from the subject knower; it is a direct and knowing awareness of the one reality in which subjects and objects have ceased to exist. One who is established in this state is known as a jnani.