New Age Ideas; Close, But …

The New Age movement (part of the new world order) changes people’s beliefs from God into believing in a universal consciousness. It blends ‘religious’, ‘spiritual’ and ‘philosophical’ concepts to maintain a global vagueness and confusion – but it feels ‘good’. We are all one in a commune-ist ideal, a great communal self, but there is something missing.

What is missing is the wisdom of what we actually are, which has nothing to do with any of the above. That wisdom is individual, pure consciousness. It’s not a consciousness trying to unite with big consciousness out there – the great unattainable – and the fact that this external consciousness doesn’t exist is the reason why we never feel good enough. At that level of understanding, we are not ‘all one’, although we’d like to think so. Very clever; it’s changing belief in one thing to belief in something other. As we are brought up with beliefs to worship, a change of idol makes no difference 🙂

In reality, we are only one on an esoteric level where we realise our true reality, but we have been encouraged to divert attention to the exoteric level, which is intended for or likely to be understood by the general public.

The New Age movement is just an alternative name for the Great Reset, and this has infiltrated religions, spiritual groups and society in general. To say this is evil may sound a little harsh, but for an ‘untruth’ to be believable, it has to have an element of truth. After all, they use the same words as the ancient teachings – such as ‘harmony’ and ‘understanding’ – but they only go so far, with many omissions.

How do we recognise this deception? By noting the way people maintain a religiousness about whatever they do, and that becomes their dogma; they merely follow the queue and pay homage.

This creates a watered-down version of absolute truth. It makes truth appear to be achievable in theory, but not in actuality.

Pure consciousness has absolutely nothing to do with religion.

As a side note: when I first attended a Tibetan Buddhist lecture (and probably being on the autistic scale 🙂 ) I said in the meeting, “This seems a bit wet.” I stayed with that lama for another eleven years, learning about Tibetan Buddhism, but never what it was all about; there were just some vague references to Mahamudra … and I finally got kicked out. I then discovered the teachings of Dzogchen, and realised that I had been looking for that all my life (the essence of Mahamudra and Dzogchen are the same, but the approach is different). It was not until I dropped everything that realisation started to develop …