What Is I?”

In Latin and Greek, the word ‘ego’ means ‘I’. The moment we refer to I, we personalise consciousness.

What’s wrong with I? How did this I come about?
I is a mistaken identity; it is an attachment to consciousness.
We say, “That person has such an ego!” when, in fact, we all have egos that we carry around.

Our original consciousness is pure and empty of ideas; it is just aware, and reflects like a clear mirror. It’s doing that now, being spontaneously present. It’s what we are. It’s seeing these words. Look away from this screen and it’s still there, just being. It is like pure space – whatever we do in space, the space stays the same. Well, the essence of mind – pure consciousness – is like that. Whatever we stir up in the mind, essence (pure consciousness) stays exactly the same. We don’t have to do any spiritual conjuring tricks to see this – it’s just here, right now.

The mistake we make is asking, “Who am I?”

If we ask, “Who am I?” we will merely go round in circles,
because we will want to identify, failing to realise the pure experience.

Ask the question, “What is I?”

The essence of being is the mirror of pure consciousness, and ideas are reflections in that mirror. Whenever this essence identifies with the reflections and holds on to them, a false feeling of self is fabricated because now, that is all that consciousness sees. It forgets the seeing and it (or we) becomes caught and held. This clinging is maintained by our likes and dislikes which gradually become our ‘second’ nature. We hold on to our judgements about a situation, instead of acting accordingly to bring about harmony, dropping any fixations.

This is a totally different picture than the one we are taught. This world that we live in is all about boosting and bettering our I, our self image – and it is this that causes misery.

We will have some sort of ‘I-fixation’ until enlightenment. In the meantime, we use a ‘social I’ – a stand-in self image to which others can relate – in order to communicate.

Whenever we personalise consciousness, we limit experience,
and consciousness can never resolve into realisation.

Our fundamental nature is happiness,
free of all fixations.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to “WHAT IS I?”

  1. tiramit says:

    “and it (or we) becomes caught and held.” What’s not said is that we let go, become uncaught, then there is no ego I, everything else is pretty much as it was.

    • tony says:

      Hello Tiramit,
      As we transcend the levels we notice that sometimes we let go, and sometimes we hang on a little longer.

      If we are drunk, that is a temporary state.
      If we are drunkard, that is a life style.

      As you say there is a natural letting go for some, and not for others.


  2. Ken says:

    What we pursue only serves to reinforce the idea of not having what we pursue. To constantly pursue results in never having. Thus to pursue the removal or destruction of the ego only reinforces the idea of an ego. That which doesn’t exist cannot be destroyed, hence trying to destroy the ego is but an illusion trying to remove an illusion. Shall the ego use the ego to remove the ego? Can anything be more selfish than trying to destroy ones ego in an attempt to make oneself “better?” Who is this one doing this for, and better than who? All is Lila!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.